Tech offices replace traders as rents outpace market economics
There used to be a stall on the corner near the old railway arches that sold, in no particular order, vintage vinyl, mismatched cutlery, and what I can only describe as an aggressively curated selection of secondhand denim jackets. The stallholder, a man everyone simply called Baz, knew the exact provenance of every single item on his table and would happily talk you through it whether or not you’d actually asked. That corner is now the ground-floor entrance to a fintech company’s UK headquarters, all glass and a security fob system, and I genuinely have no idea where Baz’s denim jackets ended up.
This is, in miniature, the story of a huge swathe of this postcode over the past fifteen years or so: markets and independent traders quietly replaced by exactly the kind of glossy commercial tenants that market stalls, back when this area was actually cheap, could never have imagined sharing a street with.
Why the Market Traders Actually Left
Market trading in this area was never hugely profitable even at its peak, running on thin margins, cash transactions, and a genuinely precarious relationship with whoever happened to own the specific patch of land or arch a trader occupied. As property values climbed with the broader area’s transformation into a genuine global tech and creative hub, landlords increasingly found it considerably more lucrative to lease space to office tenants on long, stable commercial contracts than to continue accommodating market stalls paying comparatively modest daily or weekly rates.
A market trading association representative I spoke with described the shift with evident frustration. “Nobody forced any individual landlord to evict a market trader. But when a tech company will sign a fifteen-year lease at rates a market stall could never realistically match, the actual economic decision makes itself, over and over, one arch and one corner at a time, until eventually you look up and the market simply isn’t there anymore.”
What the Tech Companies Actually Say
To be fair to the companies themselves, several have made genuine efforts to preserve some connection to the area’s market heritage, hosting occasional pop-up trading days in their ground-floor spaces or funding small heritage plaques acknowledging what previously occupied their current premises. One local tech company spokesperson described this as a genuine, if imperfect, attempt at continuity. “We’re aware we’re operating somewhere with real history,” she said. “We try to honour that where we can, even though I understand that a plaque doesn’t replace an actual functioning market stall for someone who used to shop there every single week.”
Critics, understandably, find this framing somewhat thin. “A plaque isn’t the same as Baz,” one longtime resident told me, entirely unprompted, when Baz’s old stall came up in conversation. “You can’t have a nice chat about vintage denim with a plaque.”
The Bigger Economic Story Underneath
What’s happened here reflects a broader pattern well beyond just this one postcode: as areas transform from genuinely cheap, marginal spaces into globally recognised commercial hubs, the very informality and low barrier to entry that made them attractive to small traders and creative businesses in the first place becomes economically incompatible with the property values that same transformation generates. It’s a genuinely difficult cycle to interrupt once it’s underway, because the economic logic driving it at each individual step is entirely rational, even as the cumulative effect displaces exactly the character that made the area distinctive to begin with.
Whatever Happened to Baz
I did eventually track Baz down, trading now from a considerably smaller pitch in a market a fair distance from here, still doing the same detailed provenance patter for anyone who’ll listen. He seemed remarkably unbothered by the move, all things considered. “Markets move,” he told me, with a shrug I found more philosophical than I expected. “They always have. I’ve just gone where the actual market still exists rather than where the property developers decided to put a fintech company instead.”
I think about that distinction often, the market as a living, mobile thing versus the market as a fixed location people like me get sentimentally attached to. Baz seems to have made peace with the former framing considerably faster than the rest of us locals have.
Find more from me at my author page.
For further reading, see coverage from CityAM and MyLondon.
The Denim Jackets, Resolved
I did finally ask him about the denim jackets specifically, since that detail has genuinely nagged at me since I started drafting this piece. He laughed, apparently delighted that I’d remembered such a specific detail of his old stall. “Sold most of them within a year of moving,” he said. “Turns out proper vintage denim finds an audience wherever you set the table up. The corner mattered less than I thought it would at the time. The customers who actually cared followed the stock, not the postcode.”
That’s a more optimistic ending than I expected when I started reporting this piece, and I’m not entirely sure how representative it is of every displaced trader’s actual experience. Plenty of others I spoke with described considerably harder transitions, lost regular customers, reduced footfall, genuine financial strain during the move. But I think Baz’s specific resilience is worth including anyway, if only as a reminder that displacement doesn’t automatically mean defeat, even when it very obviously means loss.
